E.0.1 What is Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)?
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is the process that is used to assess the potential effects that plans or programs with a spatial element (those relating specifically to locations or areas) may have on the environment. There is a requirement for Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) to be carried out under UK law and European Directives. The UK SEA Regulations 2004 transcribe the requirements of European Directive 2001/42/EC 'the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programs on the environment', the 'SEA Directive'. Lancashire County Council has adopted an SEA process which, whilst encompassing the requirements of the SEA Directive to assess the long-term effects of implementing its second Local Transport Plan (LTP2) on the environment, also takes into consideration the social and economic consequences of the LTP2. This approach ensures that the LTP2, whilst being environmentally sound, is also 'sustainable'.|
Sustainability as defined by the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) is; Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The UK Government within its strategy A Better Quality of Life presents four objectives for achieving sustainable development;
|
E.0.2 What does an SEA involve?
The SEA process involves five stages. These stages are described below.|
The stages of the SEA process include;
|
E.0.3 How does the SEA process link into development of the LTP2?
This SEA was carried out in parallel to, and has interacted with, the development of Lancashire County Council's LTP2. This iterative approach to SEA ensures that any potential adverse effects that the LTP2 may have on the environment are identified and mitigated or removed prior to its publication. It also means that opportunities for environmental/sustainability improvement or enhancement can be incorporated into the LTP2 as it is developed. The iterative approach to SEA also ensures that the consultation responses received at various stages in the production of the LTP2 are taken into account during the environmental assessment. The following flow diagram illustrates the links between the LTP2 and the SEA process.Figure E1 Links to SEA Process

E.0.4 What does the Environmental Report Contain?
|
The Environmental Report contains;
|
E.0.5 What does this Non-Technical Summary contain?
|
This Non-Technical Summary contains;
|
E.0.6 Relevant Plans, Programmes and Policies
The following is a list of plans, programmes, policies and UK legislation that were identified as being relevant to the Lancashire County Council LTP2 and SEA. A summary of the information and objectives presented within each of the relevant plans, programmes, policies and UK legislation, is presented in the Environmental Report.Table E.0.6 Relevant Plans, Programmes and Policies
|
List of plans, programmes and policies relevant to Lancashire County Council |
|
| National Plans and Programmes | |
|
|
Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 2000 UK Biodiversity Action Plan 1994 Working with the Grain of Nature: A Biodiversity Strategy for England 2002 Transport in Tomorrows Countryside 2003 Making the Connections: Final Report on Transport and Social Exclusion (Social Exclusion Unit, 2003 Power of Place English Heritage 2000 The Historic Environment: A Force for our Future (English Heritage) |
| Regional Plans and Programmes (North West) | |
|
Regional Transport Strategy for the North West |
Wild about the North West: A Biodiversity Audit of North West England 1999 |
| Lancashire Documents | |
|
Lancashire Joint Structure Plan 2001-2016 (2005) |
Lancashire County Council: Corporate Plan 2002-2005 |
| UK Legislation | |
|
Highways Act 1980 |
Part IV Environment Act 1995 (England and Wales) Air Quality Limit Values Regulations 2003 The Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Regulations 2003 Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 |
| Planning Policy Guidance | Planning Policy Statements |
|
PPG 2: Greenbelt |
PPS 1: Delivering Sustainable Development |
E.0.7 Key Environmental and Sustainability Issues within Lancashire
From a review of the documents listed previously, internet and other desk based research, consultations with Lancashire County Council and consultation with the Statutory Consultees (English Nature, English Heritage, Countryside Agency and Environment Agency) the following environmental and sustainability issues were identified for consideration within the LTP2 and the SEA.
The following information was used to assist the SEA process and to develop a better understanding about the area for which the LTP2 is being produced.
|
Environment Biodiversity
Landscape
Cultural Heritage
Air Quality and Climate Change
Water Environment
Land Use
Flooding
|
|
Social
|
|
Economic
|
E.0.8 The SEA Objectives
What are the SEA Objectives?
SEA objectives are statements that define what is to be achieved in terms of sustainable development. The SEA objectives were developed to assess the effects of implementing the LTP2 on the environment, local population and economy. SEA objectives are separate from the LTP2 objectives, although they may influence each other or overlap.How were the SEA Objectives Developed?
The LTP SEA objectives were also developed in the context of the required SEA Directive 'topics'. These SEA 'topics' include: biodiversity; landscape; cultural heritage; water; air; climatic factors; soil; flora; fauna; human health; population and material assets. It was also recommended in the Department for Transport's Guidance on SEA that objectives should be developed with respect to those presented in NATA (New Approach to Appraisal) outlined in TAG Unit 2.5. Appendix 6 of the Environmental Report illustrates the relationship between the NATA objectives and the SEA Directive 'topics'. The development of the SEA objectives also took into consideration objectives presented in the relevant plans and programmes listed previously and information obtained during a review of SEAs and sustainability appraisals that were undertaken for a variety of documents from a national to local level. The following table presents the Lancashire SEA objectives.|
SEA Objectives for the Lancashire County Council LTP2 Protect the Natural and Built Environment
Prudent use of Natural Resources
Community Support and Involvement
Support the Economy
|
E.0.9 Findings of the SEA Assessment
The following is a summary of the key findings of the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Full details of the method used to assess the LTP and the results of the assessment are presented in the Environmental Report. The measures for mitigating any adverse effects of the LTP on the environment, and delivering environmental enhancements, are summarised at the end of this Non-Technical Summary.Assessing the LTP2
An overview of the main findings of the SEA is presented below.|
The main transport problems in Lancashire have been identified as;
The LTP presents a number of major schemes and strategies which aim to reduce congestion, improve accessibility and improve road safety, whilst ensuring environmental protection. The three major schemes presented for implementation during this LTP2. These schemes include;
In addition to the above schemes the LTP2 has identified an additional five potential future major schemes. The viability of these schemes will be investigated during this LTP2. The SEA has identified that whilst these schemes aim to reduce congestion there is potential for the Heysham to M6 Link and Ormskirk Bypass schemes to have potentially adverse effects on biodiversity, landscape, cultural heritage, water quality, land use and increased flood risk. These effects will be assessed in detail through the EIA process. Other LTP2 strategies (Congestion, Accessibility and Road Safety) identified as having potentially adverse effects on the environment will also be subject to a full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Where an EIA is not required the LTP will adhere to mitigation measures presented at the end of the Environmental Report and summarised at the end of this Non-Technical Summary to ensure effects on the environment are minimised. Opportunities for environmental enhancement were also identified. These are mostly in association with highway improvements and new highway schemes, establishment of greenways and green networks along public rights of way and public open space and streetscape improvements. By reducing congestion the LTP will have positive benefits on local air quality and therefore human health, road safety, landscapes (urban and rural) and the vitality and viability of town centres by making them more attractive to shoppers, visitors and workers. Reductions in congestion will also have positive effects on economic growth by improving the efficiency by which goods can be moved around the County and reducing the amount of revenue lost to local businesses and the local economy through increased journey times. The schemes to improve accessibility involve improvements to public transport, improved facilities for walking and cycling and initiatives that will be developed through partnership agreements for services to be delivered more locally and to people's homes. These strategies will also have significant positive effects on social inclusion. The County Council through its Other Quality of Life Issues Chapter demonstrates its commitment to protecting and enhancing the environment. |
Table E.0.9 SEA Assessment
|
LTP2 |
LTP2 Major |
SEA Objective Categories |
||
|
Environmental |
Social |
Economic |
||
|
Chapter 5: |
Heysham |
The Heysham to M6 Link proposed route was selected following investigation into 3 alternative routes. The other 2 routes were rejected on basis that they potentially have adverse effects on European Protected Areas (Morcambe Bay SPA, cSAC and Ramsar Site and Lune Estuary SSSI). The preferred route will have positive effects on improving local air quality, road safety and human health within the City of Lancaster. There would also be improvements to the historical value and character of the City. The LTP and SEA has identified that an EIA would be required to ensure there were no significant adverse effects of the preferred route on biodiversity, landscape, views, cultural heritage, water quality, land use, increased flood risk, local air quality and noise. The EIA will also need to take into account the potential for the scheme to lead to future 'development' along the link road and the effects of this future development on the environment. |
The SEA has identified that the Heysham to M6 Link will have significant positive effects on improving road safety and human health (improved air quality and improved provisions for walking and cycling) within the Lancaster district. There will also be slight benefits to improved accessibility due to increased road space for buses. |
The Heysham to M6 Link will have significant positive effects on economic growth by improving the efficiency of road freight between the M6 and Heysham and reducing the amount of revenue local businesses lose to congestion. There is potential for future development along the link road to have an adverse effect on access to employment as the main access to this 'out of town' location would be by car. The link road will reduce congestion in the Lancaster district. This will improve attractiveness to shoppers, visitors and workers with positive effects on the vitality and viability of the City Centre and the regeneration of the Morecambe peninsula through better access to the Port of Heysham, the resort of Morecambe, the EDZ and local employment areas. |
|
Blackpool to |
The main environmental benefits of improving the Blackpool to Fleetwood Tramway are on local air quality. Improved efficiency and increased frequency of services will help increase the usage of the tram. This will have positive effects on local air quality and climate change by reducing the need to travel by car and reducing congestion along the Fylde Coast. The SEA identified that there would be minimal effects of this scheme on biodiversity, landscape, water, land use and flooding as the improvement works would only affect the existing tramway. The tram is a historic feature. Any improvements to it would benefit cultural heritage. There is potential that if the tramway is not improved then there would be closures to the track for safety reasons. This would have adverse effects on congestion and air quality. |
Improvements to frequency and reliability of the Blackpool to Fleetwood tramway would have a positive effect on accessibility. There would also be indirect benefits on human health from reductions in congestion. Closure of the tramway for safety reasons would have negative effects on accessibility and human health due to potential increases in congestion. |
The tramway is an important tourist attraction. Improved or sustained tourism would have positive effects on local employment. Closure of the tram would potentially have adverse effects on tourism along the Fylde Coast. |
|
|
Ormskirk Bypass |
The Ormskirk Bypass would have significant positive effects on reducing congestion and therefore improving local air quality within Ormskirk. The scheme will also have positive benefits on the townscape of Ormskirk by removing the visual intrusion associated with congestion. However there is potential for the scheme to have adverse effects on biodiversity, landscape, views, water quality, cultural heritage, increase the risk of flooding, local air quality and noise along the route. An EIA is currently being carried out for the preferred alignment to ensure that there are no significant adverse effects. The EIA must take into consideration the potential for future development to be located along the bypass, and the effects of this development on the environment and local population. |
The Ormskirk Bypass will have positive effects on road safety (reduced congestion) and human health (improved air quality) within Ormskirk. There will also be positive effects on social inclusion and accessibility by improving opportunities, including increased walking and cycling, for people to reach town centre services and Ormskirk Hospital. |
There will be positive benefits on the local economy of Southport by improving access to the town. There will also be benefits on economic growth by improving the efficiency of the movement of goods along the A570 and reducing the amount of revenue local businesses lose to congestion. The bypass will reduce congestion in the centre of Ormskirk. This will have positive effects on the vitality and viability of the town centres by improving its attractiveness to shoppers, visitors and workers. |
|
|
LTP2 |
SEA Objective Categories |
||
|
Environmental |
Social |
Economic |
|
|
Chapter 9: |
There are no major schemes or strategies involving construction or development in this chapter. The effects on biodiversity, landscape, cultural heritage, water, land use and flood risk will be minimal. Improvements to the quality, design and appropriateness of footpaths, cycleways and public transport facilities will have positive effects on quality and character of landscape, townscape and streetscapes. Increased use of public transport and walking and cycling will have significant positive effects on local air quality and climate change by increasing the use of less polluting, more sustainable modes of transport. |
All of the strategies presented in this chapter will have positive effects on social inclusion and accessibility. The strategy to promote walking and cycling will have positive effects on human health. The strategies will also have positive effects on community safety by improving the safety of public transport (CCTV camera installation at bus stations, bus stops, railway stations and on public transport) and by improving the safety of the streets and footpaths for walking and cycling (lighting and footpath/cycleway condition). |
The strategies presented within this chapter will have no effect on economic growth. There may be slight positive effects on improving access to employment by promoting the use of an improving the accessibility of public transport (improved information about services, increased safety). |
|
Chapter 10: |
Congestion causes an increase in vehicle emissions and the concentration of these emissions in one location. By reducing congestion the strategies presented in Chapter 10 will have positive effects on local air quality. Schemes to reduce the need to travel or promote alternative modes of transport (e.g. walking and cycling, increased use of public transport) will also have positive effects on reducing causes of climate change by reducing emissions of CO2. Congestion can also cause visual intrusion. Reductions in congestion in both urban and rural areas will have a positive effect on townscapes and landscapes and on the character of conservation areas. The SEA has identified three schemes that would have adverse effects on the environment (sustainable freight transport, park and ride and Heysham M6 Link). |
Reductions in congestion will have significant positive effects on the local population by improving road safety and improving local air quality. Promoting the use of public transport will have positive effects on social inclusion and accessibility. |
Reductions in congestion will have significant effects on economic growth by improving the efficiency of road freight between the M6 and Heysham and reducing the amount revenue local businesses lose to congestion. Promoting the use of public transport and walking and cycling will have positive effects on improving access to employment Reductions in congestion will also have positive effects on the vitality and viability of urban and rural centres by improving their attractiveness to shoppers, visitors and workers. |
|
Chapter 11: |
The strategy presented in Chapter 11 will have significant positive effects on improving local air quality and slight positive effects on reducing the causes of climate change by reducing CO2 emissions. | Improved local air quality will have a positive effect on human health. | No significant effects were identified. |
|
Chapter 12: |
There will be minimal effects of these strategies on the environment. Any adverse effects of traffic calming measures and road signage on the quality of the landscape and streetscape will be minimised by ensuring that traffic calming and road safety infrastructure is of a high quality design and appropriate to the location. | The policies presented in Chapter 12 will all have significant positive effects improving road safety. | No significant effects were identified |
|
Chapter 13: |
The strategies presented in this chapter will all have positive effects on the environment by reducing CO2 emissions, protecting landscape and biodiversity and improving public spaces (streetscape, townscape and public open space). In creating sustainable communities the Council will improve access to the countryside by promoting the use of long distance trails and introducing a network of quiet lanes and greenways to make walking cycling and horse riding safer and more popular. |
The quality of life strategies will have positive effects on improving accessibility and social inclusion by improving the attractiveness and safety of local communities. Improved walking and cycling provisions will also have significant positive effects on human health, as will reductions in traffic noise. The Council also aims to improve community safety to help create sustainable and healthier communities. |
Improvements in townscape and streetscape will have positive effects on the vitality and viability of urban and rural centres by improving their attractiveness to shoppers, visitors and workers. Tourism associated with improved access to the countryside and provisions for recreation within the countryside will have a positive effect on the rural economy by supporting cottage industries, accommodation and restaurants. |
|
Annexe A: |
By maintaining the quality of highways and transport infrastructure the Council will have a positive effect on the quality of streetscapes (rural and urban) and conservation areas. There will also be positive effects on air quality by minimising congestion from road works. | By maintaining the quality of the highways and transport infrastructure (footpaths, cycleways, street furniture, bus stops and shelters, lighting) the Council will have positive effects on health, accessibility and road safety. | Road maintenance will have positive effects on economic growth by reducing traffic delays caused by road works (repairs and urgent maintenance. |
E.0.10 Incorporating the SEA into the LTP
The following is a summary of the mitigation measures that will be applied to each of the schemes, strategies and initiatives presented in the LTP2 that were identified as potentially having significant adverse effects on the environment to ensure that, at the implementation stage these effects are reduced, avoided or minimised. Opportunities for environmental enhancement have also been recommended. The mitigation measures and enhancements are discussed in detail in the Environmental Report.|
Biodiversity and Geodiversity Protection
Enhancement
|
|
Landscape
|
|
Cultural Heritage
|
|
Water Quality
|
|
Local Air Quality and Climate Change
|
|
Flood Risk
|
|
Land Use
|